SCOTCAT.COM  

Hoplisoma granti

 

It’s a lovely catfish and would be top of many enthusiasts’ popularity lists. Not only is it pretty but C. arcuatus are reasonably common in pet shops and are not too expensive. For these reasons it’s a popular and familiar fish and many fish-keepers have a shoal of these little cats.

First described by M.G. Elwin in 1939 it has been in the hobby since at least the 1970s so it is a little surprising that breeding records of this fish are few and far between. In fact I could find only one documented case, that by Ian Fuller and described in his book – Breeding Corydoradine Catfishes.

All this being so it was more in hope than in expectation that I bought a group of these in 2004 from a local shop and another group of very young fish from BAS in Bolton the following year. Over the next few years I tried the usual methods used to spawn fish of this genus with no success. By the start of 2008 they were happily, but celibately sharing a 4ft tank with some C. rabauti, Brochis splendens and a few Danio margaritatus.

That Spring, when a few eggs appeared on the glass and on the plants I at first suspected the brochis. The C. rabauti had spawned once before and their several hundred eggs had been placed along the water line. In addition the brochis had been dancing around the tank and nuzzling each other for a while. In any event the eggs appeared to be infertile so I didn’t give it much thought. A further batch of eggs was similarly ignored although I noted that the eggs were appearing after a water change. I looked forward to my first brochis fry.

 

 

7In May 2008 I noticed some fry – a tiddler which must have been several weeks old and a couple of fry which were only just free swimming. They clearly weren’t brochis and a quick visual check confirmed they weren’t C. rabauti either. So, unless I had some highly unusual danios then they could only be young C. arcuatus. My delight was tempered by the knowledge that so few fry had been produced. I crossed my fingers and waited for a further spawning.

Three weeks later, and a couple of days after a water change, more eggs appeared (I have yet to witness the actual spawning which I assume occurs at night). This time I collected those that weren’t obviously infertile and placed them in an ice cream tub which I floated in the tank. I added some alder cones and an air line to try and prevent fungus. The eggs themselves were scattered around the tank, some stuck to plants and some to the glass. They weren’t very large as corydoras eggs go, about the same size as C. panda.

 

 

 

 

As the fry mature these spots merge into the distinctive black stripe.Happily most of the young C. arcuatus have survived and I now have fish from three different spawnings showing the complete range of patterning from fry to adulthood.

As yet there has been no fourth breeding attempt (although it’s possible they spawned whilst I was away) and it could be that this species is a seasonal breeder. I’ll be keeping a close watch on them anyway.

The spawning record is as follows:

• The tank is a standard four footer – 48” x 12” x 18” (L x D x H)
• Internal power filter (Fluval 4)
• Sand substrate with wood, moss and fern for cover
• The light is on 10 hours each day using a timer
• No heater but in this room the temperature won’t drop below 70F, more normally around 74F.
• pH 6.5 and GH is almost zero (This is my tap water unaltered). I have a few oyster shells in the tank which seem to stop the    pH drifting down between water changes but don’t appear to change the measured hardness.
• A third of the water is changed weekly or (more usually) fortnightly with untreated water straight from the tap. After a water   change the temperature will go down to about 65F.
• Spawning occurs during the night and there is a four week gap between each spawn.
• Around 30 – 40 eggs scattered on glass and plants. Fertility seems to be low with only a few from each spawn being fertile.
• Other fish in tank are Brochis splendens, C. rabauti and Danio margaritatus.

Of all the fish I’ve bred over the years this is the most satisfying although, if I’m being honest, the fish ignored my tinkering and went about their business on their own terms and in their own time. Perhaps they just needed some peace and quiet and be left to themselves for a while, something we can all relate to!

 

Editors note: We now know (2017) that this species C. arcutaus is actually a long nosed species, CW036, and the species in this article is actually C020 and has now been described for U.K aquarist and amateur ichthyologist Steven Grant: Corydoras granti Tencatt, Lima & Britto 2019.

Remarks: *Placed in Lineage 9, the "short-snouted" species with the designated type species: C. punctatus. A revision in the future would constitute the resurrection of the genus name Hoplosopma (Agassiz, 1846). As of the latest revision (Dias et al 2024) Corydoras granti has now been placed in Lineage 9 and has the new genus name of Hoplisoma.